Seven Plead Guilty to Supporting Iran Terrorist Group

-
According to the Miami Herald, seven people in California has pleaded guilty to providing material support to an Iraq-based terrorist organization. Each of the seven face up to twenty years in prison.

According to prosecutors, the defendants raised funds for the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK). According to the State Department, the militia was supported by Saddam Hussein and works against the Iranian government. The group was designated a foreign terrorist organization in 1997.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Korea Considering Adopting Plea Bargaining System

-
According to the Korea Times , South Korea is considering implementation of a plea bargaining system, and the lead prosecutor has stated that the system would initially be utilized for corruption cases. If these plans move forward, this will offer a unique opportunity to observe a criminal justice system's implementation of plea bargaining from the beginning. The prosecution is seeking to adopt plea-bargaining for corruption cases. Prosecutor General Lim Chae-jin stressed the importance of criminal law reform, including the introduction of a plea bargaining system, at the prosecution's 60th anniversary ceremony held in southern Seoul, Friday. "It is time for Korea's judiciary to adopt plea-bargaining to a limited extent, such as in bribery cases, in order to effectively punish corruption, which is getting more complex,'' Lim said. Plea-bargaining is an agreement whereby the prosecution offers a lighter punishment to a criminal suspect in exchange for admitting...
Read more

Growing Use of Sentencing Differentials in Resentencings

-
Much attention has been focused in recent years on sentencing differentials in the plea bargaining context. The term sentencing differential captures the difference in sentence received by defendants who proceed to trial versus the sentence of codefendants or similarly situated defendants who plead guilty. For example, a Vera Institute Report from 2020 entitled  In the Shadows  noted that the odds of incarceration were 2.7 times greater for those who went to trial and the sentences in their review were 57 percent longer.  See  Ram Subramanain et al, Vera Inst. of Just.,  In the Shadows: A Review of the Research on Plea Bargaining  (Sept. 2020). Many have argued that this represents a punishment for exercising one's Constitutional right to trial by jury, leading some to call this phenomenon the "Trial Penalty."  Academics have been focusing a light on this phenomenon for some time and there are now several cases indicating that the judiciary is listenin...
Read more

Supreme Court of Ohio Examines "Dark Pleas"

-
The Ohio Supreme had an interesting case in August examining the troubling issue of "Dark Pleas." The case involved Lamont Clark, who was convicted of murder in 1993. In 2015, he filed a motion for a new trial after it was discovered that prosecutors had removed part of a medical record containing exculpatory evidence from the alleged victim in the homicide. Before the courts could hear the motion, however, Clark was offered a plea deal that would result in his immediate release. Clark accepted the deal, in part, because his mother was gravely ill at the time. Seven years later, Clark sought to withdraw his plea on the basis that it was coerced and, therefore, not voluntary as required by law. While the Ohio Supreme Court did not accept jurisdiction in the matter, Justice Donnelly wrote a powerful dissent describing what he called "Dark Pleas" and the manner in which they subvert due-process rights.  From Judge Donnelly's dissenting opinion.  This appeal present...
Read more