New Piece on Plea Bargaining and the Psychology of False Pleas and False Testimony

I recently published a new article discussing plea bargaining and some of the insights that have been gained from psychological research into defendant decision-making in recent years. From the abstract for the piece:

Plea bargaining is an institution that has come to dominate the American criminal justice system. While little psychological research was done in the decades following the 1970 Supreme Court decision that approved the practice of plea bargaining, many advances have been made in this field in the last decade. We now know, for example, that a significant number of defendants will falsely plead guilty in return for the benefits of a bargain. Further, we know that the presence of counsel can actually increase, not decrease, the prevalence of false pleas of guilty. We also know that pretrial detention can drastically increase the rate of false pleas of guilty by the innocent. Finally, we know that defendants will not only falsely plead guilty, but that they will also falsely testify against a co-defendant in return for the benefits of the deal. This piece examines each of these findings and considers what this research means for the future of bargained justice.

The article was published in the For the Defense magazine. A free copy of the article is available for download here.